Reading Response:

          Jessica Daniel, a detective, has received a new case: a person has been murdered inside their own home, with all the windows and doors locked from the inside. As more bodies are found in the victim's own homes, Jessica learns to focus on her physical surrounding versus concentrating on how the killer got in and who they could be. This book, Locked In by Kerry Wilkinson, stresses the importance of being aware and paying attention to one's surroundings.

          The first example of how the book stresses the importance of paying attention to one's surrounding is on page 178 of the book, when a friend of a friend shows Jessica how easy it is to divert one's attention from the important details. When Jessica first meets this person what she notices most prominently about him is the fact that he is wearing two watches and odd shoes. But later he proves that the most important thing that she did not notice was how he preformed a seemingly impossible magic trick. He then gives her advice, " I do know that with anything that looks impossible, the obvious answer is almost certainly the correct one." What this means is that Jessica has been overthinking how the murderer got in while the answer is quite simple. She is missing all the obvious clues that are hidden in her surroundings.

          Another example of paying attention to one's surroundings is on page 220 when Jessica chooses to double check a persons background and accidentally finds another lead that unravels the whole murder case. Because Jessica was so thourough in checking the people in the background that were still somehow related to the murder, she found an important clue. If she had not paid attention to the minor details, she may not have solved the mystery. "Jessica felt there was something important still left to be said." By not backing down and being persistent on working on the minor details, she manages to find a large piece of the puzzle.

          The final example of the importance of paying attention is on page 278 when Jessica chooses to follow a lead on a hunch. Previously, Jessica talked to the families of the murdered people, she noticed that in two of the homes, there was a robbery, and in another, someone put glue on the locks. " One of (the kids) put glue in the front-door lock one night. We had to climb out a window." She double checks the lead and remembers the advice that she was given earlier. She realizes how easy it would be to enter and then lock the house from the outside after murdering the people if you have an extra set of keys. She finds the locksmith and consequentially finds the murderer.

          In conclusion, the detective novel, Locked In by Kerry Wilkinson, displays the importance of paying close attention to details by showing us how small things aid Jessica Daniel in solving the murder case.

Reading Response

Though the book Feed by M.T. Anderson is set in the future, it has many themes and social issues that we today can relate to. One of these social issues is humans' unhealthy reliance on technology. The humans in the book rely on technology for nearly everything, from day-night cycles to job interviews to their own survival. In the world of Feed, most people have a microchip inserted and hooked up with their brain. This microchip, called a Feed, controls nearly everything that surrounds the people. The people never stop to think about what would happen if the Feed no longer existed. When their technology breaks down or malfunctions, they die. Humans are too reliant on technology in their everyday life.

The first time this issue appears in the book is when the main character and his friends go to the moon and are attacked by a hacker/terrorist. When the terrorist hacks into their Feed, he causes them to malfunction and black out. The bodies of the humans could not deal with the hack because they depended on the Feed to send signals to the rest of the body. When the Feed broke, it was sending too many impulses that the body could not deal with. If their body was not so closely linked with the Feed, that would not have happened.
Another example of when people rely on technology appears in many descriptions of neighborhoods in the book. The wealthier people have their personal sun  and sky that they control. This artificial sun, in wealthy families, is located at about one per house. They can control this sun by using their Feed. The families that are poor, however, usually have one sun per block or per neighborhood. In poor neighborhoods, the artificial sky is always peeling off like wallpaper, and the suns don't seem as bright or they aren't the latest model. People don't have a real sun so they have to use machines in order to keep track of time, this can lead to issues if someone's sun is not in sync with all the other ones.
Finally, in the book, people who have the Feed are given more advantages than people who do not have one. At job interviews, people who have the Feed can communicate and talk about someone in private. One does not have the advantage of knowing what others are thinking and saying to their peers. And, in some instances, people without a Feed may not be given the same job as people with a Feed simply because they do not have the microchip embedded in their brain. It isn't fair if some people are given an advantage over others because they have a certain piece of technology. People have become too dependent on technology to bring them information and give them an advantage at life.

The problem that exists in the world of Feed, also exists in our world. Humans have become too dependent on technology in the modern world. Statistics show that the average human checks his or her phone at least 110 times a day! When the machines fail, the people panic. We are so used to things being done our way and technology always working that we never consider what would happen if all of those machines stopped working. What if, one day, it would happen just like in the book Feed and technology would fail just when we needed it most? To minimize the damage caused by technology if it fails, humanity needs to learn to do things on its own, like it did before computers.

The book Feed by M.T. Anderson displays some of the issues and shows us the after effects of relying on technology. The reliance that people have on technology is severe and addicting. If it isn't stopped, problems will occur in the future.

Reading Response: CTQ 1

There is a saying that "life isn't fair."  Some may have mixed feelings about this, but Chinese Cinderella by Adeline Yen Mun has made me think and realize what 'unfair' exactly means. Chinese Cinderella is a true story of a girl considered bad luck and blamed by her family for the death of her mother, who died while giving birth to her. All her life she was ignored by her father and hated by her siblings. However, once her father notices her when she brings in a medal from school. Jun-Ling soon learns that winning medals is the only way she can make her father recognize her. Her father  remarries and her new step-mother is a woman who despises all the children from her father's first marriage. She sends Jun-Ling to a boarding school far away, knowing that the part of the country that the boarding school is located in is about to be taken over by Communists. Fortunately, she is rescued by her step-mother's sister, who is actually a really nice and fair woman. Jun-Ling rejoins her family, only to be sent away to another boarding school. Eventually she enters an international writing contest and wins. She is able to persuade her father to send her to college.

This book has made me realize that in life, one has to fight his or her way up to success and happiness. Not a single person is born with the same advantages or disadvantages an it's much easier to roll down the mountain of success than it is to climb it. Only the determined and persistent people peak this mountain.

Argument Essay

*I wasn't sure if we had to post our final draft or not, here it is anyway

All over the country, books have sparked arguments. The main question is should controversial books be banned from schools and libraries? Some parents say yes, while teens argue that they are educated and responsible enough to make their own decisions. Parents want to ban books because of content, however, this will prevent children from learning valuable lessons and may actually attract children to read this content. Ender’s Game, a book that has been discussed in our class more than once, teaches about the effects of violence by introducing that violence into the graphic descriptions. No book deserves to be banned and teens, being knowledgeable about social issues and controversial topics, should be able to decide what they want to read. Books should not be excluded from school libraries because they teach important life lessons and teens are responsible enough to choose the literature that they will read.

            Many, especially parents, believe that some books are too dark to be in children's libraries or at school. One prominent example of this opinion is described in the article "Darkness Too Visible" when the mother enters the bookstore. The parent says "nothing, not a thing, that that I could imagine giving my daughter. It was all vampires and suicide and self-mutilation, this dark, dark stuff" (Gordon 1). This represents many parents' opinions. In fact, many parents have taken steps to prevent teens from reading these books. New books like The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins, loved books like Harry Potter by J.K. Rowling, and more classical books like The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger, are ending up on the list of "most frequently banned" books from the past 20 years (Doll 2) . Some are taking actions so severe that these books are actually permanently banned in certain schools and states. I can see how some of these books may not belong in the school library. Fifty Shades of Gray by E.L. James, from what has been written about it, seems to be a pornographic novel. For certain most kids don't want to read a book like that. Other books, like Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card, don't have such vivid graphical details but many parents protest against the violence in the book. There is violence in that book, no one could deny that. After all, the book does have many scenes where children beat each other up in cruel, inhumane, ways. However, violence is the norm now for nearly all literature aimed at teenagers. Take The Hunger Games, which is a war trilogy. Twilight by Stephanie Meyer has some pretty violent description in vampires ripping off each other’s heads as well as more details on topics concerning sex, reckless behavior, and suicide. Divergent by Veronica Roth, another popular book, includes the same topics and the violence in the book equals that of in The Hunger Games. Many teen books contain dark themes, and some may be inappropriate to keep in school libraries. However, children adapted to this darkness. Not only literature that is aimed at teens is violent and dark, movies and video games also fall under that category. The ratings on movies and video games have seriously been skewed. Now, the most violent movies are being rated “PG-13” and movies with even more of this content, if that is even imaginable, are getting rated “R”. Naturally, teens are attracted to this content in the cinema and in games because of how effective the advertising is. Over the years it has become so that the most violent media is more popular than media without any suggestions of these dark topics. The teens are not to blame for this growth, the parents and authors aren’t to be blamed either. Society is the one we should be directing our pointer fingers at. Society has allowed dark media to grow more popular. If someone reads a particular book, or watches a particular movie, and then tells the people surrounding them about that media, chances are those people are going to read, or watch, it. That group of people is most likely going to repeat the process of the first person. And there you have it, a chain reaction has begun. The reason why darker themes are cropping up more frequently in YA books than they did several decades ago, is because this sort of content was not acceptable at that time. In addition, technology has progressed a lot and we now have the chance to see these chain reactions occur online.  Teens have adapted to all of this violence and they now are able to recognize the message behind all of the graphic details.

Furthermore, banning controversial books such as Ender's Game may actually bring them unwanted attention. R.L. Stine, author of Goosebumps says "It is a badge of honor to have people try to ban your books from schools and school libraries, only because it means your books have become popular and are being noticed" (Doll 3). And Suzanne Collins notes that she has "never noticed any kind of sales decrease because of these censorship campaigns. Usually they prove to be good publicity" (Doll 3). Ms. Stoddard, who works at a bookstore, "admits that creating a separate section [in libraries] may inadvertently lure the attention of younger children keen to seem older than they are" (Gurdon 5).  Some media doesn’t gain that much publicity from being banned. The movie Ender's Game, for example, did not gain any publicity from the critics' negative feedback. The responses on the movie did not affect sales of the book in a positive or negative way. This shows that some books may gain publicity from banning, censoring, or isolation while some books may not be affected at all.

Parents do not understand that these controversial books teach valuable lessons. Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card, for example, however grim it is in its use of violence and descriptions, teaches about the terrifying results of violent acts. After Ender fights with an older boy, the book depicts Ender crying "I didn't mean to hurt him!" (Card 212) There are many examples of this throughout the book, and all of them show how mentally scarred Ender is after each of these experience. Ender's Game shows teens that the effects of violence are never good and may even hurt you, if not physically, then mentally. If Ender's Game was banned from school libraries, some teens may have no way of learning about violence because their parents are sheltering them from it and schools would be unable to provide it. It is better to educate our youth about controversial issues than hiding those issues away from their sight. It is better to be armed with knowledge about the outside world than go naively skipping around problems that we do not know how to respond or find a solution to. The lessons in some controversial books are crucial for teens to comprehend and are applicable to the world.

These books should not be censored from teens because they teach important life lessons. Some books, such as Ender’s Game, may contain violence. However, teens should know what they are ready to read and what they would rather avoid. They are responsible enough to make these choices and do not need to be sheltered from books.

 

 

Reading Response:

Recently, I have finished a book called Feed by M.T. Anderson. Though this book is set in the future, it has many themes and social issues that we today can relate to. One of these social issues is humans' unhealthy reliance on technology. The humans in the book rely on technology for nearly everything, from day-night cycles to job interviews to their own survival. In the world of Feed, most people have a microchip inserted and hooked up with their brain. This microchip, called a Feed, controls nearly everything that surrounds the people. The people never stop to think about what would happen if the Feed no longer existed. This shows how reliant they are on the machine to work.

The first time this issue appears in the book is when the main character and his friends go to the moon and are attacked by a hacker/terrorist. When the terrorist hacks into their Feed, he causes them to malfunction and black out. The bodies of the humans could not deal with the hack because they depended on the Feed to send signals to the rest of the body. When the Feed broke, it was sending too many impulses that the body could not deal with. If their body was not so closely linked with the Feed, that would not have happened. Another example of when people rely on technology appears in many descriptions of neighborhoods in the book. The wealthier people have their personal sun  and sky that they control. This artificial sun, in wealthy families, is located at about one per house. They can control this sun by using their Feed. The families that are poor, however, usually have one sun per block or per neighborhood. In poor neighborhoods, the artificial sky is always peeling off like wallpaper, and the suns don't seem as bright or they aren't the latest model. People don't have a real sun so they have to use machines in order to keep track of time, this can lead to issues if someone's sun is not in sync with all the other ones. Finally, in the book, people who have the Feed are given more advantages than people who do not have one. At job interviews, people who have the Feed can communicate and talk about you in private. You do not have the advantage of knowing what they are thinking. And, in some instances, people without a Feed may not be given the same job as people with a Feed simply because they do not have the microchip embedded in their brain. It isn't fair if some people are given an advantage over others because they have a certain piece of technology. People have become too dependent on technology to bring them information and give them an advantage at life.

The problem that exists in the world of Feed, also exists in our world. Humans have become too dependent on technology in the modern world. Statistics show that the average human checks his or her phone at least 110 times a day! When the machines fail, the people panic. We are so used to things being done our way and technology always working that we never consider what would happen if all of those machines stopped working. What if, one day, it would happen just like in the book Feed and technology would fail just when we needed it most? To minimize the damage caused by technology if it fails, humanity needs to learn to do things on its own, like it did before computers.

The reliance that people have on technology is severe and addicting. If it isn't stopped, problems may occur. The book Feed by M.T. Anderson displays some of the issues and shows us the after effects of relying on technology.

 Argument Essay. Draft 2

All over the country, books have sparked arguments. The main question is should controversial books be banned from schools and libraries? Some parents say yes, while teens argue that they are educated and responsible enough to make their own decisions. Parents want to ban books because of content, however, this will prevent children from learning valuable lessons and may actually attract children to read this content. I believe that no book deserves to be banned, and that teens should be able to decide what they want to read.

Many parents believe that some books are too dark to be in children's libraries or at school. One prominent example of this opinion is described in the article "Darkness Too Visible" when the mother enters the bookstore. The parent says "nothing, not a thing, that that I could imagine giving my daughter. It was all vampires and suicide and self-mutilation, this dark, dark stuff" (Darkness Too Visible 1). This represents many parents' opinions. In fact, many parents have taken steps to prevent teens from reading these books. New books like The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins, loved books like Harry Potter by J.K. Rowling, and more classical books like The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger, are ending up on the list of "most frequently banned" books from the past 20 years (The Banned Books We Have Loved 2) . Some are taking actions so severe that these books are actually permanently banned in certain schools and states. I can see how some of these books may not belong in the school library. Fifty Shades of Gray by E.L. James, from what I have heard about it, seems to be a pornographic novel. I certainly don't want to read a book like that and wouldn't want my kids in the future to read that kind of literature either. Other books like Ender's Game don't have such vivid graphical details but many parents protest against the violence in the book. There is violence in that book, no one could deny that, after all, the book does have many scenes where children beat each other up in cruel, inhumane, ways. However, violence is the norm now for nearly all literature aimed at teenagers. Take The Hunger Games, which is a war trilogy. Twilight by Stephanie Meyer has some pretty violent description in vampires ripping off each others' heads as well as more details on topics concerning sex, reckless behavior, and suicide. Divergent by Veronica Roth, another popular book, includes the same topics and the violence in the book equals that of in The Hunger Games. Many teen books contain dark themes, and some may be inappropriate to keep in school libraries.

Banning controversial books such as Ender's Game may actually bring them unwanted attention. R.L. Stine, author of Goosebumps says "It is a badge of honor to have people try to ban your books from schools and school libraries, only because it means your books have become popular and are being noticed" (The Banned Books We Have Loved 3). And Suzanne Collins notes that she has "never noticed any kind of sales decrease because of these censorship campaigns. Usually they prove to be good publicity" (The Banned Books We Have Loved 3). Ms. Stoddard, who works at a bookstore, "admits that creating a separate section [in libraries] may inadvertently lure the attention of younger children keen to seem older than they are" (Darkness Too Visible 5).  Some books don't gain that much publicity from being banned. Movies are also a kind of media. The movie Ender's Game, for example, did not gain any publicity from the critics' negative feedback. The responses on the movie did not affect sales of the book in a positive or negative way. This shows that some books may gain publicity from banning, censoring, or isolation while some books may not be affected at all.

What parents do not understand, is that these controversial books teach valuable lessons. Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card, for example, however grim it is in its use of violence and descriptions, teaches about the terrifying results of violent acts. After Ender fights with an older boy, the book depicts Ender crying "I didn't mean to hurt him!" (Card 212) There are many examples of this throughout the book, and all of them show how mentally scarred Ender is after each of these experience. Ender's Game shows teens that the effects of violence are never good and may even hurt you, if not physically, then mentally. If Ender's Game was banned from school libraries, teens would have no way of learning about violence because their parents are sheltering them from it and schools would be unable to provide it. It is better to educate our youth about controversial issues than hiding those issues away from their sight. It is better to be armed with knowledge about the outside world than go naively skipping around problems that we do not know how to respond or find a solution to. The lessons in some controversial books are crucial for teens to comprehend and are applicable to the world.

In conclusion, I believe that these books should not be censored from teens because they teach important life lessons. Teens should know what they are ready to read and what they would rather avoid. They are responsible enough to make these choices and do not need to be sheltered from books.

Works Cited:

Card, Orson Scott. Ender's Game. New York: Tor, 1991. Print.

Doll, Jen. "The Banned Books We Have Loved." The Atlantic Wire. N.p., 12 Apr. 2012. Web. 14 Nov. 2013.

Gurdon, Meghan Cox. "Darkness Too Visible." The Wall Street Journal. N.p., 4 June 2011. Web.